California’s 2008 ballot measure, Proposition 8, which outlawed same-sex marriage in the not-so Golden State, argued that the traditional two-parent family, led by both a mother and a father, was the ideal place – determined by nature itself – to raise a child. Sounds right to me. But, to O? Not so much.

Moreover, the Regime argues that children don’t even need mothers. Or fathers. More on that later.

In August 2011, a federal district judge found that Proposition 8 violated the equal protection rights of same-sex couples. In February 2012,  a federal appeals court declared that Proposition 8 violated the 14th Amendment by discriminating against gays and lesbians, all but ensuring that the case will proceed to the Supreme Court. That’s where O comes in – once against ramping up pressure on SCOTUS to rule in the Regime’s favor.

In a brief submitted to the Court by O’s Solicitor…