Bob Unruh
The lead investigator in Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s review of the authenticity of Barack Obama’s birth certificate today unloaded a bombshell about the case: that he was told by sources members of the media were threatened with federal investigations should they continue to report on the birth certificate issue.
Lead investigator Mike Zullo told WND that as he was preparing information to be presented to the public “it was clear that the mainstream media was not going to be in attendance” at the sheriff’s scheduled new conference, where he presented facts suggesting both fraud and forgery in the image of a Hawaiian birth certificate that the White House released last yearas “proof positive” of Obama’s eligibility for office.

“During our investigation, we actually were told [that media] had been threatened with FTC investigations. Commentators [had been] threatened with their jobs,” Zullo said.
The threats were so intimidating that some individuals quit their positions over safety concerns for their families, he said.
See how many watched Sheriff Arpaio’s press conference on live-streaming, and discover how you can get more information about the eligibility issue, and tell your friends and neighbors about it.
So the problem became to get the information to the American public in spite of an intentional media blackout, since citizens still must make critical leadership decisions about their government through the election process.
The solution was an ebook with details from the investigation, the evidence that was accumulated, and the issues that remain for Arpaio and his investigators to pursue.
Zullo has been blasted in recent days for coordinating the book project with longtime political writer Jerome Corsi. Much of the online criticism stems from a single AP article that links Zullo to “well-known political conspiracy writer” Corsi and includes a statement that Corsi “denied using Sheriff Joe Arpaio … as a promotional tool to sell his books and theories.”
It cites Zullo “as the co-author” of the ebook. But it fails to mention the evidence presented by the investigation indicating crimes of fraud and forgery.
Zullo told WND that he had no interest in working on an ebook but was faced with the question of how to get the information to the American people absent national media coverage. There were interests outside of Arizona, he was convinced, making obvious efforts to censor the information and never allow it to move beyond the borders of Arizona.
Read the results of Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation.
Zullo told WND that as an investigator he sought transparency, and he just wanted the information made available to everyone who wished a closer look. He said it was not an easy decision. He knew he would be ridiculed by the media if the information was released, but the alternative of allowing the information to be squelched and people kept in the dark was just too much of an injustice. He decided to allow the ebook project in order to disseminate the facts of the case: that there is probable cause to believe Obama’s birth certificate document is a forgery.
Corsi confirmed that Zullo was very reluctant to do the book. The prospect of being reimbursed financially from his investigation never was his intention. But Corsi pointed out that Zullo contributed six months of his time to the investigation. Corsi also said he was acutely aware of the financial sacrifice Zullo made over the last six months, having to devote much of his time to the investigation. The posse investigation was not subsidized by taxpayers.
The bigger question, Zullo said, is how can an investigator or a law enforcement officer ignore findings that indicate deception at the highest levels of politics. Zullo said it’s a very serious and alarming concern that casts doubt on the integrity of the vetting of presidential candidates.
“If the evidence took us the other way, and the sheriff proclaimed this thing to be authentic, the news would have traveled from Arizona to New Jersey to Hawaii in milliseconds,” he said. “If I wrote a book about it, I would have been hailed a hero.
“All we’re trying to do here is get this information out there and keep it out there. Had the mainstream media done their job, we wouldn’t have done [this book].”
He said now media members have started calling him a “kook” and an “old geezer” for reporting on the facts that resulted from the investigation.
“The media just wants to come destroy people’s credibility,” he said. “They’re trying to vet [investigators] when they should be vetting the next presidential candidate of the United States.”
He said that many people didn’t come forward with their knowledge about Obama “out of fear.”
“The information that we got, which these people refused to step forward with out of fear, but shared afterward, came independently – they don’t even know each other – from distant parts of the country, that investigations of major media outlets [were planned] if they continued reporting,” he said.
“Our system is broken because the vetting process used to rely on the free press. We don’t have a free press any more,” he said.
Although the numbers may have been small, there was support for Zullo’s perspective, even in the media.
In a column at American Thinker, Cindy Simpson quoted Ronald Reagan in support of Zullo’s work.
“Ronald Reagan was fond of saying, ‘Trust, but verify,’” she wrote. “President Obama told us he released his official long-form birth certificate on April 27, 2011. Can we trust him, and should we verify?
“Most of the reporters’ questions at the end of [Arpaio’s] press conference were statements in defense of Obama, and the subsequent coverage by major news outlets asserted that rumors about the president’s birth certificate were ‘debunked’ and ‘discredited,’ but gave no details of the debunking or discrediting,” she marveled.
“As the sheriff also noted at the conference, no specific or official investigation has ever been reported, unless we can count Savannah Guthrie, apparently the only reporter allowed to touch and photograph the original long-form certificate after it was released, or the two representatives of Factcheck (neither noted as having an relevant professional experience in document examination) who photographed the short-form certification posted in 2008,” she wrote.
“To paraphrase another favorite Reagan quotation, ‘It isn’t so much that the mainstream media are ignorant. It’s just that they know so many things that aren’t so,’” she added.
She noted that after reporters attacked the message at the news conference, they “questioned the motives of the sheriff and even the political affiliation of the posse’s lead detective, Mike Zullo.”
She said the focal point for a true reporter would be the issue at hand – the validity of Obama’s documents.
“Was the document posted by the White House a scan of an original certified document? Based on the analysis of the posse’s experts, it was not. In fact, the posse has traced the image to a specific computer where it resided a mere 20 minutes before it was uploaded, and has identified a ‘person of interest.’”
She suggest three possible answers: purely innocent anomalies to “touch up” an image and someone purposely tinkering to create the appearance of suspicion.
“Third, if the certificate is indeed an intentional forgery, we have witnessed the greatest fraud of the century,” she said.
“In my local paper, there was not even a single line devoted to the posse’s stunning assertions. What happened to ‘Extra! Extra! Read all about it! The posted birth certificate of a sitting president a possible forgery!’”
Read The Rest/PakAlert Press
Categories: Whoppers
Coming Soon to a Cow Near You – Fart Vaccine
Woman Fears for Her Life After Seeing Trump Yard Signs – What???
Ann Coulter’s War: Trump is ‘a complete blithering idiot’ & ‘a big betrayer’
Why Worry About Truth In Everything?
Re: “Obama Threatens Media With Federal Investigation If They Pursue Birth Certificate!! ”
Answer. Obama DID NOT threaten the media with a federal investigation if they pursued the birth certificate, and he was really born in Hawaii as the birth certificate—short form and long form–proves. And this is further confirmed by the public Index Data file and by the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961, and by the repeated confirmation of the facts on Obama’s birth certificate by the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii, including the former Republican governor (who is a friend of Sarah Palin’s).
LikeLike
Obama is illegal alien,no wonder he’s destroying USA on purpose,he’s a punishment to all people who deny God and his holyness.Wikipedia says that there are 10% of atheists,plus add all those other false religions…we are accepting everything accept christianity
LikeLike
Yes we are, and the churches have went right along with it.
LikeLike
For Obama to have been born in a foreign country both the officials in Hawaii of BOTH parties and the public Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers in 1961 by the DOH would ALL have to be lying, AND Obama’s relatives would have had to have had enough money and be willing to waste it sending their pregnant only daughter on a trip ALONE to a foreign country (since WND has proven that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961)—–when there were perfectly good hospitals in Hawaii.
Re the claim that Obama “threatened the media.” Well, you have to believe the CLAIMS of Sheriff Joe the Cold Case Posse to believe that, and such prominent conservatives as Ann Coulter, Glen Beck and the National Review do not:
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/292780/conspiracy-again-editors
LikeLike
Thank you for your information, and the link it’s a very interesting article. I am not republican or democrat, I’m a registered independent. I have come to distrust both parties. I will leave the link here for others to read. Thanks again, and God Bless.
LikeLike
I also am a registered Independent.
LikeLike
There are a lot of unanswered questions about this president, I don’t know, I only read the investigations and reports. I have read multiple sources on this, and even if his birth certificate is legitimate, he has dual citizenship here and in Indonesia, his school records show that, he, according to reports has used 2 different names, his social security number does not look legal. He has ties to shady characters to say the least. I’m not a constitutional lawyer, but I think if you have other allegiances that he has had in the past (His father and step-father and his citizenship in Indonesia) you can not be president. If he had been vetted by the media to start with, this might have been cleared up. I wouldn’t have voted for Clinton either, but just sayin…. Alot of unanswered questions.
LikeLike
Re: “he has dual citizenship here and in Indonesia, his school records show that, ”
Yes, an unsigned school application in Indonesian says that he is an Indonesian citizen. But is that proof that he is an Indonesian citizen??
Answer: No, of course it isn’t. So what is? Well calling the Indonesian Embassy and ASKING is one way to find out. And the answer is, that he is not and never was an Indonesian citizen.
And, if he were, it would have absolutely no effect. We have already had several Presidents who were either dual citizens at birth or when they were actually president. James Madison, who was made a full voting citizen of France by the French National Assembly, is an example of the latter.
The citizenship of Obama’s father has no effect on his National Born Citizenship status, since the original meaning of NBC comes from the common law and refers to the PLACE of birth, which for Obama was, as we know, Hawaii.
The Social Security number turns out to have been caused by a typographical error, which millions upon millions of us have had.
LikeLike
Thank you for the information, I’m not going to debate this. There are a lot of unanswered questions with this. I thank you again, but I’m done responding to this. I will read your information and feel free to send any you have. God Bless.
LikeLike
Re “there are a lot of unanswered questions?”
So ask them.
LikeLike
Re: “There are a lot of unanswered questions about this president…”
When I said “so ask them,” that meant that I offered to answer your questions on this subject.
LikeLike
Please consider the following facts and then answer:
What are the odds that the officials of both parties in Hawaii are lying about Obama’s birth certificate? Officials of BOTH parties, including the former Republican governor of Hawaii, have repeatedly confirmed that they sent the short form and long form birth certificates to Hawaii and that the facts are accurate on them.
What are the odds that somehow Obama in 2007, when the short form birth certificate was sent to him, was able to convince a clerk in Hawaii to lie and send a birth certificate that said on it that he was born in Hawaii, when—according to birthers—there was nothing in Obama’s file?
Obama did receive a short form birth certificate from Hawaii in 1987, and it says on it that Obama was born in Honolulu. Clerks only fill in the forms that generate birth certificates from the documents in the file. So there must be a document in the file and it must say “born in Hawaii”—or else Obama in 2007 (when he was only a junior senator from Illinois) got the clerk to lie.
How likely is that to happen? What are the odds against it happening? About a million to one–or more?
How likely was it that Obama’s mother even traveled outside of Hawaii in 1961. There has never been any evidence shown that she even had a passport. And, Hawaii is thousands of miles from any foreign country. And, Obama’s American grandparents were certainly not rich (the grandfather was a furniture salesman and his grandmother was just a low-level employee in a bank at the time). And, WND has proven with a FOI Act request that Obama’s father stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961—-so, if Obama’s mother had traveled outside of the USA, she would have had to have traveled ALONE. How likely is that? What are the odds against it. About a million to one—or more?
So, what are the odds against—a million times a million—about 10 billion against it happening.
Yet birthers insist that there is a realistic chance that it happened, that Obama was really born outside of the USA. Why? Because, the original claim was that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya. But, it turns out that she didn’t say that at all; birther sites simply made it up. The full transcript of the taped call is available for anyone who wants to see it. If you do, just ask, and I will post it.
So Obama’s Kenyan grandmother did not say that he was born in Kenya, and the Kenyan government says that it investigated and that Obama was certainly not born there, and only 21 people came to the USA from Kenya in 1961, and of them only one came by air (and if Obama’s mother was that one, it would have had to have been by air because of the dates when she was attending college and when she had to start college again). So what are the odds that Obama was born in Kenya? About a million to one against?
Yes, Obama’s publicist did make a mistake and say that Obama was born in Kenya. That’s where the “born in Kenya” story comes from. But it was a mistake; it is not true; it cannot be true considering that the officials in Kenya say that he was not born there and the officials in Hawaii say that he was born there. So, how does the mistake affect the question of where Obama was born? Answer, it doesn’t.
So here is the question for Independent thinkers—where do you think that Obama was born?
Still think there is a chance that Obama was born in a foreign country? Well, if so, then answer this: If he was, how did he get from that country to the USA? You know that children cannot just be carried into the country; they require travel documents—such as being entered on their mother’s US passport. So, if Obama had been born in Kenya—or any other country—he would have had to have been entered on his mother’s US passport at a US consulate or embassy in that country. And there would be multiple records of that happening. Not merely the passport file, but the record of applications for changes to the passport, and those file would still exist. And, if they existed, they would have been found back during the Bush Administration, which was in charge of all of those files when it was in charge of the US State Department.
And yet no such file has ever been made public. Why not? Well either the Bush Administration was in on the plot, or there is no such file, and the latter is vastly more likely, isn’t it?
So, what are the odds that Obama’s mother traveled outside of the USA when she was pregnant at huge expense and high risk of stillbirth (the incidence of which was high at the time)? What are the odds that somehow she was able to get Obama back from a foreign country without any record of an application to add him to her passport? What are the odds that if all that happened, she was able to get a birth certificate into the files in Hawaii that says on it that Obama was born in Kapiolani Hospital in Honolulu, or that the officials of both parties (including the former Republican governor of Hawaii) are lying about all that today?
Perhaps all the officials in Hawaii ARE lying. But isn’t it more likely that the birthers are lying? After all, they did lie when they said that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that Obama was born in Kenya. And they did lie when they said that the current governor of Hawaii, Abercrombie, said that he could not find Obama’s birth certificate. (He never said any such thing.) And they were lying when Obama’s lawyer “admitted” that his birth certificate was forged. (She never said any such thing either.) And they were lying when they said that Hawaii Registrar of Births Onaka “admitted” the birth certificate was forged. (He never said any such thing either.)
The bottom line is that the birth certificate of Hawaii says that he was born in Hawaii, and that is confirmed by the officials and the public Index Data file (want to see it? just ask) and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 (and only the DOH could send notices to the Health Bureau Statistics section of the newspapers). And there is not a shred of proof that Obama was born anywhere else than in Hawaii, and such a trip for his pregnant mother would have been HIGHLY unlikely.
LikeLike
I have been more than polite with you even thanking you for your information. But now your bordering on rude and downright hateful. Unless you are Barack Obama, I have nothing to ask you. I will provide some links that raise more questions than answers even the statement about passports for his mother. I did not write this article, I posted it here because it relates to the times we are living in. And you are helping to prove that, by attacking and calling names. I am done with this conversation, you have left enough information to prove your point, there are over 3 million pieces of evidence on the internet on this matter. The readers I have here have the gift of discernment and will decide on their own. Here are the articles that refute what you say, and then I’m done. You’ve made your point, now move on. If you read my about page you will know that I welcome differing opinions but I will start removing comments that are like your last one. I am not calling or called you a liar, and you will not call others that on my blog. Yes that’s right this is my blog, it’s a Christian Conservative blog for the times of prophecy that we are living in, this may not be the blog for you. I will keep you in my prayers. God Bless.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/israeli-science-website-obama-birth-certificate-forged/
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/post_1.html
http://www.westernjournalism.com/we-dont-need-obamas-birth-certificate/
LikeLike