Lindsey Graham Implies Failure to Strike Syria May Result in U.S. Getting Nuked


My Comment:  There are reports of the US military moving massive amounts of equipment and nuclear warheads to the east coast.  Will they get their war one way or another, with a false flag event on the east coast?

Sen. Lindsey Graham

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, who has been a vocal supporter of striking Syria, appeared to imply that if the U.S. doesn’t take military action against President Bashar al-Assad’s regime a nuclear war may ensue.

“I believe that if we get Syria wrong, within six months – and you can quote me on this – there will be a war between Iran and Israel over their nuclear program,” Graham told a gathering of supporters in South Carolina Wednesday, according to U.S. News and World Report.

“It won’t come to America on top of a missile, it’ll come in the belly of a ship in the Charleston or New York harbor,” he added.

via Lindsey Graham Implies Failure to Strike Syria May Result in U.S. Getting Nuked | TheBlaze.com.



Categories: news

Tags: , , , ,

4 replies

  1. What sen. Greham implies is that if Syria Assad and his likes are allowed to own mass destruction weapons, such weapons are soon to infiltrate through retaliation or other pretext to the western world. Assad is killing his own people without any mercy, to defend his reign on the country, so do you think he would have any ethical values when it comes to security of westerners if he decides one day that it is in his interest to strike??
    You might say that the U.S. has no business interfering and rescuing the poor people from the slaughtering of the “pol-pot” like tyrants of this century (Assad and his wretched allies Iran), but the problem is that Obama is toying with Syria and acting against the resistance who are trying to overturn this tyrant by placing an embargo on their arms. This action from Obama might be regarded as partnering with Assad in his massacre. Don’t you think that depriving a victim from means to defend themselves against a murderer amounts to becoming an accomplice to the murder???
    You might also say that the resistance is Al-Qaeda and that Assad despite his murderous nature is better than Al-Qaeda: Well, firstly this is not true, and Hezbolla and other factions fighting along with Assad are way more villans and fundamentalists, but more importantly, it is the Syrians who are rebelling against their oppressor whilst Hezbolla is a foreign faction. Do you think it is natural that free people rebel against someone who violates the constitution and takes over power forever?? Or do you believe the “news for the naives” who claims that the majority are with Assad??
    Finally, the U.S. wishes to disregard their role as leaders of the world and defender of the rights of the oppressed and democracy, this is fine, but the government should ethically stop interfering in Syria by hindering the arming of the resistance. Also, what difference if your loved ones die with chemical or other weapons??? This sherade about chemical weapons is a hipocracy!!!!!

    Like

  2. This article made me remember a video that you’ve posted a while ago, where the eastern part of the US is being prepared for a disaster-like emergency. There was a talk about military training, emergency water supplies, emergency food supplies (and it all needs to be done by September 30th)……… I tried to look for it in your archives, but was not able to find it…

    Like

Rev. 22:20 'Surely I am coming quickly, Amen. Even so, come Lord Jesus!'

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.