My Comment:  As I watched this unfold over the weekend, a lot of things came to mind, but the number one thing was the office of Propaganda that Hitler used, as he used the nations radio stations, and newspapers to spread his propaganda.  And even ancient Rome as Ceaser Augustus used Art and images as propaganda.  This is not a new thing.  It’s ancient.  The NYT is read by 30 million people around the world.  So what better outlet for propaganda.  Read the full article, you will be surprised.

And lets not forget Hillary Clinton’s ‘What difference does it make?!’  Well it makes a lot of difference.  And the spin doctors are working overtime.

(Front Page Magazine) To help put Hillary Clinton in the White House, the once-great New York Times has published a dubious report swallowing the Obama administration’s lies about the Sept. 11, 2012 Islamist attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya.

In an act of journalistic malfeasance, the agenda-setting newspaper of record concluded over the weekend that the once-obscure “Innocence of Muslims” YouTube video sparked the armed assault that left four Americans dead at the height of last year’s presidential election cycle. The newspaper also concluded that al-Qaeda wasn’t involved, ignoring the mountain of evidence suggesting al-Qaeda was involved.

Read the full article via The New York Times’ Benghazi Revisionism | FrontPage Magazine.

Related articles

• The New York Times Begins Hillary Clinton Presidential Campaign To Obfuscate Benghazi Libya (theconservativetreehouse.com)
• NY Times Benghazi Report Meant To ‘Clear The Deck’ For Hillary (conservativebyte.com)

Categories: news, propaganda, Whoppers

Tags: Al-Qaeda, benghazi, hillary clinton, Innocence of Muslims, libya, New York Times, White House