Home › new world order › In The Day’s Of Lot: Stunner! State to help infertile ‘gay’ duos

In The Day’s Of Lot: Stunner! State to help infertile ‘gay’ duos

By C. J. Refsland on April 10, 2013 • ( 2 )

My comment: Romans chp. 1 ‘They exchanged the truth of God for a lie…. Because of this, God gave them over in shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. Paul goes on to warn about even those who approve of those who practice these things.”

(WND) Majority Democrats in the California legislature over the years have demanded that school children celebrate the life of homosexual activist and reported sexual predator Harvey Milk.

They’ve also demanded that children as young as 5th grade be taught any consensual sexual behavior is “safe” as long as you “protect” yourself. And bisexuality and transexuality are “normal.”

But the state’s new proposal, AB 460, the “Health care coverage: infertility” proposal by California homosexual advocate Tom Ammiano takes the state’s pro-homosexual actions to a whole new level.

AB 460 would extend the idea of “non-discrimination” to homosexuals and lesbians regarding fertility, allowing them to be classified as “infertile” if they are unable “to conceive a pregnancy or to carry a pregnancy to a live birth after a year or more of regular sexual relations without contraception.”

They would then be eligible for insurance coverage for “treatment of infertility, except in vitro fertilization, under those terms and conditions as may be agreed upon between the group subscriber or the group policyholder and the plan or the insurer.”

“Coverage for the treatment of infertility shall be offered and provided without discrimination on the basis of age, ancestry, color, disability, domestic partner status, gender, gender expression, gender identity, genetic information, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation.”

“No wonder California taxpayers are going bankrupt,” said a commentary at Breitbart.com. “Even biology must take a back seat to political leftism now.”

The commentary said the legislation’s “fact sheet” notes that insurance companies are refusing coverage “based on[the policy holder’s] not having an opposite sex married partner with which to have one year of regular sexual relations without conception.”

Pondered Breitbart.com, “Makes sense, due to biology.”

The proposed change would apply the requirement that insurance companies provide benefits for “Treatment for infertility,” which includes “procedures consistent with established medical practices in the treatment of infertility by licensed physicians and surgeons, including, but not limited to, diagnosis, diagnostic tests, medication, surgery, and gamete intrafallopian transfer…”

It applies to homosexuals and lesbians alike the provision, “For purposes of this section, ‘infertility’ means either (1) the presence of a demonstrated condition recognized by a licensed physician and surgeon as a cause of infertility, or (2) the inability to conceive a pregnancy or to carry a pregnancy to a live birth after a year or more of regular sexual relations without contraception.”

California has a long record of legislatively promoting homosexuality and other alternative lifestyles. Just last year lawmakers demanded that any counseling involving sexual orientation change for minors be banned – even if the minor and the minor’s parents requested it.

That law is on hold while it is fought over in court.

It would require all counselors dealing with minors to affirm homosexuality and all its variations under all circumstances, regardless of the requests of the minor or his or her parents.

Earlier, the California lawmakers’ pursuit of a free-sex atmosphere in public schools and elsewhere included a vote in which the majority Democrats killed a plan that would have cracked down on intimate relationships between school teachers and their students.

The unsuccessful Assembly Bill 1861 would have made it a felony if any teacher or employee of a public or private school “engages in a sexual relationship or inappropriate communications with a pupil.”

Randy Thomasson, president of SaveCalifornia.com, has created a Rescue Your Child website, which encourages parents to seek out church schools or homeschooling options for their children.

His group explains that already in California’s public schools children as young as 5th and 7th grades are told they have the “individual” and “personal” right to engage in “respectful” sexual activity with anyone as long as it is consensual and males wear a condom.

California has adopted numerous sexual indoctrination bills, including SB48, which requires positive portrayals of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons in public school social studies and history classes.